User Controls

Let’s see what really happened, shall we

  1. Also, how did the guys in the truck know about security footage of a crime being committed ... or of the jogger peeking into a window at a construction site.

    I’ve done the same thing many many times (looking into windows, of new builds at a construction site)
  2. Originally posted by CASPER It looks like thats what they were doing. Honestly i dont think theyre going to be able to get a murder charge. Like Zimmerman, its not illegal to follow someone. Whoever initiates the attack becomes the aggressor. Theres goimg to be a lot of plotting timelines, discussion of reasonable belief of threat, etc. If itd been more blatant, it probably would e ended up like that cop who shot the guy in the back,

    I haven’t seen the video - did the guys in the truck stay in the truck? It’s my understanding 1 of the men was outside of the truck and brandished a shotgun. That in itself, is an aggressive, threatening move.

    The jogger did not have a vehicle (also a weapon) nor any obvious weapon - he was wearing shorts and a T-Shirt.
  3. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Both clowns have now been arrested for murder and aggravated assault. I hope they enjoy getting buttfucked in federal prison.
  4. CASPER Soldier of Fourchin
    Originally posted by Stopffs I haven’t seen the video - did the guys in the truck stay in the truck? It’s my understanding 1 of the men was outside of the truck and brandished a shotgun. That in itself, is an aggressive, threatening move.

    The jogger did not have a vehicle (also a weapon) nor any obvious weapon - he was wearing shorts and a T-Shirt.

    Spectral posted video earlier here. From what i saw, the first man stood to the left of the truck and sec d man stayed in the truck bed the whole time, no weapon drawn. Jogger ran past truck to the right, then zig zagged to the left straight at the dude with the shotgun, BEFORE the forst shot is fired. I cant tell either way from the video, but “brandishing” usuallyhas a very specific criteria, and just having a weapon in hand doesnt always meet that.

    The part that gets me most is how this is being framed. Every single headline on my ipad headlines app is some permutation of “2 white men killed unarmed black jogger”. The races of the suspects are NEVER mentioned in mainstream news when a perpetrator is black and a victim is white, asian, jedi, etc.

    If you google “Tessa Majors murder”, nothing says “Three black teens brutally stab to death unarmed white girl”

    If you google “John Weed fredericksburg fair” nowhere does it say “Black teens beat unarmed 60 year old white man to death over $1”

    if you search for the child who was thrown over the railing at the mall of America, it doesnt say “Black Man attempts to kill white 5 year old boy”

    If you search “Mackenzie Lueck murder”, nowhere does it say “White college student brutally dismembered and burned by black man”


    It could be confirmation bias ofc, but it seems to me as thouh race only becomes a relevant factor when people need to be riled up, and when the perpetrators can be framed as white (or close enough to white as in Zimmermans case)
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  5. CASPER Soldier of Fourchin
    Most explicitly, if you google Kori Ali Muhammad, it says things like “Fresno man charged in string of racially motivated killings”. “Or 3 killed in deadly shooting spree” or it mentions the race of the victims but not the fact that the murderer was black. Which is a soft way of saying “Avowed Black Racist Hunts and Kills 5 Unarmed White Men”.

    I mean if the roles had been reversed, this would be framed like another Dylan Roof. But it was such a blip on the radar that no one even knows who the fuck this guy is. lol



    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/california-man-convicted-murder-racist-shooting-spree-killed-3-fresno-n1190171

    “California man”? could be anyone. “Racist shooting spree”? Bet its those wypipo back at it again. lol.

    Point being the frame of reference always just shifts based on the perpetrators and victims...and its fucking weird and gross.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  6. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by CASPER Spectral posted video earlier here. From what i saw, the first man stood to the left of the truck and sec d man stayed in the truck bed the whole time, no weapon drawn. Jogger ran past truck to the right, then zig zagged to the left straight at the dude with the shotgun, BEFORE the forst shot is fired. I cant tell either way from the video, but “brandishing” usuallyhas a very specific criteria, and just having a weapon in hand doesnt always meet that.

    The part that gets me most is how this is being framed. Every single headline on my ipad headlines app is some permutation of “2 white men killed unarmed black jogger”. The races of the suspects are NEVER mentioned in mainstream news.

    If you google “Tessa Majors murder”, nothing says “Three black teens brutally stab to death unarmed white girl”

    If you google “John Weed fredericksburg fair” nowhere does it say “Black teens beat unarmed 60 year old white man to death over $1”

    if you search for the child who was thrown over the railing at the mall of America, it doesnt say “Black Man attempts to kill white 5 year old boy”

    If you search “Mackenzie Lueck murder”, nowhere does it say “White college student brutally dismembered and burned by black man”


    It could be confirmation bias ofc, but it seems to me as thouh race only becomes a relevant factor when people need to be riled up, and when the perpetrators can be framed as white (or close enough to white as in Zimmermans case)

    The White Man is bad, and everyone should know it, according to the radical leftist twits. That's why. And they're about as obvious as a cow on a rooftop. Pathetic, really.
  7. CASPER Soldier of Fourchin
    Originally posted by -SpectraL The White Man is bad, and everyone should know it, according to the radical leftist twits. That's why. And they're about as obvious as a cow on a rooftop. Pathetic, really.

    I cant imagine its that concerted and deliberate an effort. I feel like there was tobe some less insidious, organic monetary motive. I just got to read about how the SPLC got Google to “clean up” its search results on black on white crime to only feature “legitimate” sources...like the SPLC. rofl. fml.

    https://www.splcenter.org/20180614/biggest-lie-white-supremacist-propaganda-playbook-unraveling-truth-about-%E2%80%98black-white-crime
  8. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by CASPER I cant imagine its that concerted and deliberate an effort. …

    Well, that's incredibly naive and gullible. You just might be a big part of the problem, in covering for the retards.
  9. CASPER Soldier of Fourchin
    I just dont easily buy into GloboJew conspiracy theories. So a bunch of predominately white and jedi people are orchestrating hate of white people beecaaaaaauuuuuussse?

    If its for money, thats a motive. But itd have to be demonstrated.
  10. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by CASPER I just dont easily buy into GloboJew conspiracy theories. So a bunch of predominately white and jedi people are orchestrating hate of white people beecaaaaaauuuuuussse?

    If its for money, thats a motive. But itd have to be demonstrated.

    You just set out several examples yourself, which proves the pattern. And yet you still doubt. Do they have to write you a signed confession?
  11. Originally posted by -SpectraL Both clowns have now been arrested for murder and aggravated assault. I hope they enjoy getting buttfucked in federal prison.

    whoa.

    i didnt know your pro negroes.
  12. Cathay Coof African Astronaut [the ariled affirmatory basinet]
    Originally posted by CASPER I just dont easily buy into GloboJew conspiracy theories. So a bunch of predominately white and jedi people are orchestrating hate of white people beecaaaaaauuuuuussse?

    If its for money, thats a motive. But itd have to be demonstrated.

    People aren't rational. By now "whitey bad" is kinda a religion, like catholicism. Except in the new religion you get to feel guilty, but there is no forgiveness.
  13. Originally posted by CASPER Spectral posted video earlier here. From what i saw, the first man stood to the left of the truck and sec d man stayed in the truck bed the whole time, no weapon drawn. Jogger ran past truck to the right, then zig zagged to the left straight at the dude with the shotgun, BEFORE the forst shot is fired. I cant tell either way from the video, but “brandishing” usuallyhas a very specific criteria, and just having a weapon in hand doesnt always meet that.

    The part that gets me most is how this is being framed. Every single headline on my ipad headlines app is some permutation of “2 white men killed unarmed black jogger”. The races of the suspects are NEVER mentioned in mainstream news when a perpetrator is black and a victim is white, asian, jedi, etc.

    If you google “Tessa Majors murder”, nothing says “Three black teens brutally stab to death unarmed white girl”

    If you google “John Weed fredericksburg fair” nowhere does it say “Black teens beat unarmed 60 year old white man to death over $1”

    if you search for the child who was thrown over the railing at the mall of America, it doesnt say “Black Man attempts to kill white 5 year old boy”

    If you search “Mackenzie Lueck murder”, nowhere does it say “White college student brutally dismembered and burned by black man”


    It could be confirmation bias ofc, but it seems to me as thouh race only becomes a relevant factor when people need to be riled up, and when the perpetrators can be framed as white (or close enough to white as in Zimmermans case)

    This also holds true with race on race crimes as well.



  14. Netflxchillr African Astronaut
    my 'opinion' is to wait and see what the Grand Jury determines.

    It is good they got an outsider to Prosecute and the previous other PA's recused. Having an independent committee investigate or the GBI is what was/is needed to be done if the gunman was a former police officer in the same county that is/was first "investigating" the incident for What the father & son is/are being charged with.

    To me, it is also a little telling in what the initial charge is: Murder & Aggravated Assault.


    It didn't/doesn't say 1st or 2nd Degree Murder. and

    Aggravated Assault generally involves a 'deadly' weapon and/or may of resulted in serious physical injury/death. (Again, this all can or will vary/ies from state to state verbiage/law). Not knowing all the details or Georgia State law on 'brandishing a fire-arm' or Georgia's law governing 'Burglary' (again, varies state to state) I think he'll get, ultimately, charged with the 'lessor' degree of Murder- or Voluntary/Involuntary Manslaughter or the charge of a 'higher' degree of Aggravated Assault.

    I would, also, 'think' Georgia Burglary law will, may, be key tho in determining which it will be... since it was big factor as to why they were following the jogger in the first place. As, i, over & over again reiterate such laws depends/varies from state to state and in some states it is legal to chase, detain, or use any necessary force concerning burglary.

    I, personally, don't see the malice for 1st or 2nd Degree murder as portrayed in all the Mainstream Media hyperbole. That is only my opinion by what "i" saw in the video. One thing that will truly factor in over the Aggravated Assault charge- is... how the jogger did, also, 'aggressively' grab for the shotgun. That puts a whole different 'category' on the kind of Murder & Assault charge that the Grand Jury will determine and hand down; for which, I don't think the family of the jogger is/are going to be very happy with, because:

    "FACTS don't care about FEELINGS"

    this is only my "opinion" of/for myself going off of what i see by/in the video- and until the Grand Jury makes the exact (& ultimate) determination on it... everything in the mainstream media or my/anyone's opinions?-- won't/don't mean squat.
  15. Expressing opinions about anything on this site, only mean squat to the person posting it and any poster reacting to it.

    Good morning PB 🤚
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  16. Cathay Coof African Astronaut [the ariled affirmatory basinet]
    Originally posted by Netflxchillr "FACTS don't care about FEELINGS"

    Here's a fact - the facts and circumstances of this case don't matter, they hate you cos you're white, they're not after justice, they're after racial revenge, and you won't ever get them to like you.
  17. Technologist victim of incest
    It’ll be interesting to see how this plays out. I’m sure it’ll drag on for awhile, especially with this pandemic.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  18. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Originally posted by Ernst Kaltenbrunner try getting jury duty some time. i get that shit every year…so i can tell you first hand it is the biggest travesty of justice ever invented.

    people are fucking stupid. and the lawyers/judges are even stupider.



    I've always heard that you have to be a moron to not be able to get out of jury duty.

    I've never been a juror and you "get that shit every year".

    What does that tell you?
  19. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny whoa.

    i didnt know your pro negroes.

    I'm pro human. Quiet, nipper.
  20. Originally posted by -SpectraL I'm pro human. Quiet, nipper.

    how is wishing the two dudes who may or may not have murdered a negrow getting butt fucked in prison pro human.
Jump to Top