User Controls
What happened to hydroxychloriquine?
-
2020-04-25 at 11:27 AM UTCMore YouTube videos
No studies -
2020-04-25 at 1:35 PM UTC
-
2020-04-25 at 1:38 PM UTCchris cuomo is such a faggot, a total shill. He never got sick and that whole thing where he was called fredo was obviously him trying to attention whore.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-04-25 at 2:17 PM UTC
Originally posted by Bill Krozby it is a study he just gave you statistics.. a positive correlation that the drug helps people
Lol statistics are not the same as a study. Good god you're dumb.
This is like those people that say weed cures cancer because they dont read the actual studies to see that it only stunts tumor growth -
2020-04-25 at 2:41 PM UTC
-
2020-04-25 at 2:52 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny you can have studies without statistics but you cant have statistics without studies.
Yeah you can. 87% of statistics are made up, and 45% are not repeatable. You can find a statistic or snippet or quote for almost anything you want to prove. What matters is that other studies have been able to repeat those results. If you cant read the study, you can't verify the claim, or the legitimacy/funding of the institution/journal, or how outdated the study is.
That's why videos are worthless without a link to the study. Trump ordered a study on chloroquine that'll be done by one single place in Virginia. 750k of tax dollars he spent on this. I've no doubt it'll prove exactly what he wants it to prove while ignoring things like the mortality rate.
Repeatable science is the closest truth we have in the world. Regressives don't seem to understand that, despite being surrounded everyday by the inventions of people who believed in the values of repeatable science. Regressives have been doing this shit for centuries. Science has always come out ahead and remained constant. Regressives haven't. See: Hitler. -
2020-04-25 at 3:14 PM UTC
-
2020-04-25 at 3:49 PM UTC
-
2020-04-25 at 3:56 PM UTC
-
2020-04-25 at 4:56 PM UTCYou are phenomenally stupid and literally nothing you ever say is even tangentially related to the posts I or anyone else makes. You have a serious comprehension issue as well as the issue of jumping to conclusions despite your lack of understanding.
-
2020-04-25 at 4:58 PM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace You are phenomenally stupid and literally nothing you ever say is even tangentially related to the posts I or anyone else makes. You have a serious comprehension issue as well as the issue of jumping to conclusions despite your lack of understanding.
No, no, he's actually being really clever, see, it's just a role he is playing and it's not retarded whatsoever. -
2020-04-25 at 5:07 PM UTC
-
2020-04-25 at 5:22 PM UTC
-
2020-04-25 at 5:34 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL Renowned virologist Dr. Didier Raoult did the study, retard. And he proved you and your leftist nutbag clan dead wrong.
Yeah I know what study you're talking about. It's complete bullshit. This is the study.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477893920301319
Here's what's wrong with it:
At enrollment, 92% of the patients had a “low” score in the National Early Warning Score (NEWS), suggesting they were not very sick.
The average time between onset of the COVID-19 symptoms and being enrolled in the study was 5 days. This suggests that the patients had already been sick for a while.
Only 15% of the enrolled patients had a fever. Fever is one of the characteristic symptoms of COVID-19, so people with a positive PCR but no fever are probably only mildly ill, or maybe already recovering.
Of the 12 patients who had a fever, the mean temperature was 38.6C (101.5 degrees F).
Only half of the enrolled patients had a lower respiratory tract infection.
15% of these patients required oxygen.
Four patients were asymptomatic.
No control group in his study
He also illegally used children in his study which you can see in the study itself.
And lets not forget what he said in Janurary when he said that China shutting down was “delirious” in one of his institute’s YouTube broadcasts. “There are three Chinese who die and that causes a worldwide alert, the WHO gets involved, people talk about it on television and radio. … All that’s crazy, there’s no lucidity.”
This guy is a supposed virology expert yet he didn't see this coming like the majority of experts? Must not be that smart.
And even if his study was acceptable and not tremendously flawed, it would still be just ONE against the many others showing chloroquine to either have no effect or increase mortality rate. -
2020-04-25 at 5:52 PM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace You are phenomenally stupid and literally nothing you ever say is even tangentially related to the posts I or anyone else makes. You have a serious comprehension issue as well as the issue of jumping to conclusions despite your lack of understanding.
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny lol wut ?
statistics need not to be repeatable in order for them to be statistical.
statistics arent scientific theories.
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace In order for them to be truthful statistics they do, retard. Work on your athletic abilities.
something repeatable can not change. therefore according to you in order for statistics to be truthful, their recordings must remain perpetually unchanged. -
2020-04-25 at 6:05 PM UTC
-
2020-04-25 at 6:14 PM UTC
-
2020-04-25 at 6:16 PM UTCYes, vinny, and nothing about your example with rain on different days of the week has anything to do with what I said. Keep up.
-
2020-04-25 at 6:19 PM UTC
-
2020-04-25 at 6:20 PM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Yeah I know what study you're talking about. It's complete bullshit. This is the study.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477893920301319
Here's what's wrong with it:
At enrollment, 92% of the patients had a “low” score in the National Early Warning Score (NEWS), suggesting they were not very sick.
The average time between onset of the COVID-19 symptoms and being enrolled in the study was 5 days. This suggests that the patients had already been sick for a while.
Only 15% of the enrolled patients had a fever. Fever is one of the characteristic symptoms of COVID-19, so people with a positive PCR but no fever are probably only mildly ill, or maybe already recovering.
Of the 12 patients who had a fever, the mean temperature was 38.6C (101.5 degrees F).
Only half of the enrolled patients had a lower respiratory tract infection.
15% of these patients required oxygen.
Four patients were asymptomatic.
No control group in his study
He also illegally used children in his study which you can see in the study itself.
And lets not forget what he said in Janurary when he said that China shutting down was “delirious” in one of his institute’s YouTube broadcasts. “There are three Chinese who die and that causes a worldwide alert, the WHO gets involved, people talk about it on television and radio. … All that’s crazy, there’s no lucidity.”
This guy is a supposed virology expert yet he didn't see this coming like the majority of experts? Must not be that smart.
And even if his study was acceptable and not tremendously flawed, it would still be just ONE against the many others showing chloroquine to either have no effect or increase mortality rate.
Everything you've said is either a lie, a half-truth, or outright dishonest.
