User Controls
What happened to hydroxychloriquine?
-
2020-04-23 at 2:59 AM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Yeah you're totally right. They haven't done any of those in the 224 years humans have been using vaccines.
by equating vaccine tests made 224 years ago to todays testing criteria your equating vaccines made 224 years ago to vaccines produced and tested or unyested these days. -
2020-04-23 at 2:59 AM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL Studies aren't going to help the immediate situation. The hydrocloroquine will.
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace He did yesterday. 750k of taxpayer dollars down the drain.
Okay now everybody, watch as the Regressives switch sides.
Now testing is important! We can't give untested drugs to people!
Don't worry about what Trump said on March 28th when he lied about the FDA almost being done testing that didn't even get funded till April 21st. Don't worry that he told people to 'just take it'. -
2020-04-23 at 3 AM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny by equating vaccine tests made 224 years ago to todays testing criteria your equating vaccines made 224 years ago to vaccines produced and tested or unyested these days.
You are so fucking dumb I'm just going to picard you again. I think you have autism or something because your social navigation is shit.
-
2020-04-23 at 3:09 AM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace You are so fucking dumb I'm just going to picard you again. I think you have autism or something because your social navigation is shit.
i kno. picard is your go to solution when you no longer have a retort to your retardations.
amd the only social navigation your ever gonna get from me is my penis around your lower disgestive tract. -
2020-04-23 at 3:12 AM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny i kno. picard is your go to solution when you no longer have a retort to your retardations.
amd the only social navigation your ever gonna get from me is my penis around your lower disgestive tract.
Yeah that's cute and all but you should work on your athletic abilities. None of what you said for the last three pages is based in reality. -
2020-04-23 at 3:18 AM UTC
-
2020-04-23 at 3:20 AM UTC
-
2020-04-23 at 3:22 AM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny go back to being immune to lactose intollerant.
lol.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23326523 -
2020-04-23 at 3:37 AM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23326523
lol no, your either lactose tollerant or your lactose intollerant.
the fact that you called yourself immune to lactose intollerant proved you knew nothing about lactoses or tollerances.
immune to lactose intollerance is a double negative and nigger-tier its on the same level as saying you 'dindu muffin'.
-
2020-04-23 at 3:38 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra honestly not that much, all things considered. there have been reports of it being effective, and if there is a use for it it'll save the medical system a whole lot of strain
Not really. It's pretty acutely stressful on the liver and heart. They stopped testing in Brazil because people were dying of heart attack. This is why the mortality rate in people who are given chloroquine is higher than people who are not. The studies where it show it helps only focus on the symptoms. I mean yeah, it can give a boost to the immune system, but it's not a safe drug to be using. Definitely not something to be given to the majority of patients. Just think of how many elderly already have heart or liver problems.
The only strain on the medical system it will save is the beds it'll free up by sending people to the graveyard. So fucking stupid to believe this is any kind of solution or anything special just because somebody said it. It's untested on the coronavirus and is only to be used in specific instances as a last ditch effort drug. Is it useful? Maybe in certain situations. But it's just another tool. People are so hung on making it a political thing that they won't look at the science. There are reasons most medical authorities are saying people shouldn't be using it right now.
I mean you have Trump telling people to outright take it and that it isn't harmful, and FOX saying it's a 100% cure, it's no surprise that the Regressives cling onto every word and believe it's going to end corona and 'get us back to work'. -
2020-04-23 at 4:38 AM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny
lol no, your either lactose tollerant or your lactose intollerant.
the fact that you called yourself immune to lactose intollerant proved you knew nothing about lactoses or tollerances.
immune to lactose intollerance is a double negative and nigger-tier its on the same level as saying you 'dindu muffin'.
-
2020-04-23 at 4:48 AM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Not really. It's pretty acutely stressful on the liver and heart. They stopped testing in Brazil because people were dying of heart attack. This is why the mortality rate in people who are given chloroquine is higher than people who are not.
I'm aware. What I mean is there have been several doctors (and several 'doctors') who've claimed that chloroquine by itself or in tandem with another drug have drastically shortened the hospitalisation period for people severely affected by the virus. IF found to be true, it can potentially be used to significantly free up hospital resources.
And yeah it definitely carries a risk of cardio complications, which is why it really shouldn't be used outside of the hospital.
Point is Trump being a mong doesn't automatically invalidate the drug's potential uses -
2020-04-23 at 5:16 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra I'm aware. What I mean is there have been several doctors (and several 'doctors') who've claimed that chloroquine by itself or in tandem with another drug have drastically shortened the hospitalisation period for people severely affected by the virus. IF found to be true, it can potentially be used to significantly free up hospital resources.
And yeah it definitely carries a risk of cardio complications, which is why it really shouldn't be used outside of the hospital.
Point is Trump being a mong doesn't automatically invalidate the drug's potential uses
Literally nobody said it did so I dont know why you're making that point -
2020-04-23 at 9:40 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra I'm aware. What I mean is there have been several doctors (and several 'doctors') who've claimed that chloroquine by itself or in tandem with another drug have drastically shortened the hospitalisation period for people severely affected by the virus. IF found to be true, it can potentially be used to significantly free up hospital resources.
And yeah it definitely carries a risk of cardio complications, which is why it really shouldn't be used outside of the hospital.
Point is Trump being a mong doesn't automatically invalidate the drug's potential uses
the thing is there are multiple strains of the viruses out there and even within the same strain of virus people get a variety of reactions and symptoms and combinations thereof which means that having one med cures all is impossible.
just today i read news that said the viruses caused undue blood clots and thickening.
what they should do is to list drugs that should be prescribed according to symptoms observed.
arguing what drugs work and what doesnt isnt going to be helpful at all.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-04-23 at 10:33 AM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Literally nobody said it did so I dont know why you're making that point
Yes, you did. You've been Orange Man Bad anally retentive since 2016. And pretty well anything you've said so far is totally false, because you're desperate to get at Trump. You're pathetic, ยงmยฃรgรL. Face it. -
2020-04-23 at 10:35 AM UTC๐๐๐๐๐๐๐The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-04-23 at 10:58 AM UTCHydroxychloroquine was approved for medical use in the United States in 1955. It is on the World Health Organization's List of Essential Medicines, the safest and most effective medicines needed in a health system. In 2017, it was the 128th most commonly prescribed medication in the United States, with more than five million prescriptions.
Guess how many people died from hydrocloroquine from 1955 until March 2020? None. -
2020-04-23 at 10:58 AM UTC๐๐๐๐๐The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-04-23 at 4:50 PM UTC^this
-
2020-04-23 at 5:11 PM UTC*Posting in a tds thread*The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
