Social distancing is easy when you were already socially distant.

1. 2020-03-26 at 1:30 AM UTC

   #21
   

   Shep Proudfoot Houston

   Originally posted by snab_snib you believe in the existence of the virus. you are a sheep.

   
   what stated goes 4 most every known virus jackass.
2. 2020-03-26 at 1:33 AM UTC

   #22
   

   -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]

   Originally posted by Shep Proudfoot what stated goes 4 most every known virus jackass.

   
   Virus known what 4 most stated every jackass goes.
3. 2020-03-26 at 1:35 AM UTC

   #23
   

   snab_snib African Astronaut

   Originally posted by vice admiral slippery slapper i could see a few people looking at me but the only one that said anything to me was the cashier who asked where i bought it.

   
   should have said the dark net
4. 2020-03-26 at 1:35 AM UTC

   #24
   

   Shep Proudfoot Houston

   Originally posted by vice admiral slippery slapper false
   
   stop being a retard
   
   also…if this were true, go ahead and explain why the health care officials wear respirators when around the diseased wuhan victims
   
   idiot

   
   to prevent more contamination to the victims any hazmat protocol calls for respirators ignoramus.you idiots w/ your shitty 3m dentist masks aint doing shit but looking dumb lol.
5. 2020-03-26 at 1:39 AM UTC

   #25
   

   Shep Proudfoot Houston

   Originally posted by vice admiral slippery slapper go ahead and give me your expert opinion on this shitty looking dumb dentist mask:
   
   

   
   one would say a paranoid idiot would wear that to prevent the flu lol.
6. 2020-03-26 at 1:39 AM UTC

   #26
   Erekshun Naturally Camouflaged
   correct
7. 2020-03-26 at 1:45 AM UTC

   #27
   

   -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]

   Originally posted by Shep Proudfoot masks may thwart you spreading the virus but does zero for contraction, stop being sheep.

   
   That's not what the New York Times said last year, before the virus was released. They said a mask is semi-effective in preventing getting infected by the coronavirus. Just goes to further prove how the globalists are behind this. They have so many scams and lies going they forget what they just said last. But pesky people like me are paying attention to their fuckups.
   
   "And when well, wearing a mask around those who are sick will probably decrease your own chances of becoming infected…"
   
   "In a 2013 study, researchers counted the number of virus particles in the air around patients with flu. They found that surgical masks decreased the exhalation of large viral droplets 25-fold. The masks were, however, less effective against the fine viral droplets that can remain suspended in the air longer and are therefore more infectious, cutting them by 2.8 times."
   
   https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/23/well/live/face-masks-work-healthy-colds-flu-immunity-prevention.html
   The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!

   • Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country
8. 2020-03-26 at 1:48 AM UTC

   #28
   

   Shep Proudfoot Houston

   Originally posted by -SpectraL That's not what the New York Times said last year, before the virus was released. They said a mask is semi-effective in preventing getting infected by the coronavirus. Just goes to further prove how the globalists are behind this. They have so many scams and lies going they forget what they just said last. But pesky people like me are paying attention to their fuckups.
   
   "And when well, wearing a mask around those who are sick will probably decrease your own chances of becoming infected…"
   
   "In a 2013 study, researchers counted the number of virus particles in the air around patients with flu. They found that surgical masks decreased the exhalation of large viral droplets 25-fold. The masks were, however, less effective against the fine viral droplets that can remain suspended in the air longer and are therefore more infectious, cutting them by 2.8 times."
   
   https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/23/well/live/face-masks-work-healthy-colds-flu-immunity-prevention.html

   
   ny times is akin to the national enquirer since 2012 lol.try bloomberg or a real publication & you will read differently.the masks do indeed help if you are a carrier.
9. 2020-03-26 at 1:50 AM UTC

   #29
   

   -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
   I think the mask helps stop transmission both ways, and the globalists are lying about it and getting their fake news ghouls and their useful idiots to parrot the talking point they don't, so more people get infected.
10. 2020-03-26 at 1:51 AM UTC

    #30
    

    snab_snib African Astronaut
    obviously masks are a barrier to transmission by the mouth and nose. the point is that there's no more reason to wear them today than there was a year ago.
11. 2020-03-26 at 1:52 AM UTC

    #31
    

    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Wearing the mask can help you not get the virus. That's why they keep saying it won't help you.
12. 2020-03-26 at 2 AM UTC

    #32
    

    snab_snib African Astronaut
    no, they're saying it for the hell of it, basically. saying masks help or don't help just create different kinds of panic, they don't particularly care which.
    
    all they care about is that it does make people act like retards.