User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 99
  6. 100
  7. 101
  8. 102
  9. 103
  10. 104
  11. ...
  12. 1897
  13. 1898
  14. 1899
  15. 1900

Posts by -SpectraL

  1. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Rumor has it that Lanny has an escape hatch.
  2. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by larrylegend8383 Friendly reminder: Drumpf lost the last 2 popular votes, was impeached, and is only the 2nd one term POTUS in the last 40 years.

    Even Dubya managed to get reelected hahahaha

    Trump will have a second term. Don't worry your little, empty head.
  3. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    The love of money is the root of all evil.
  4. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by ORACLE Electrical impulses are objects within our reality.

    The only way you could verify that is through electronic and chemical impulses.
  5. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Talk about your sore losers.
  6. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    All of our reality is merely a series of electronic and chemical impulses. Nothing more.
  7. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    The recounts in Arizona, Georgia, and the other states are likely to go heavily for Trump.

    Most of the likely errors or invalid votes took place on mailed in ballots. (Machine votes are harder to tamper with). Since Biden won upwards of two-thirds of mail-in votes and absentee ballots, it's likely that most of the discarded mail ballots will be subtracted from Biden’s total.

    The networks currently give Trump 214 electorate voters (270 is the victory level).

    Alaska, where Trump has led by 2:1 all week and is now more than half counted will likely throw its 3 votes to Trump giving him 217.

    Trump has likewise led in North Carolina (15 votes) all week and his margin of 75,000 has not diminished. He will undoubtedly carry North Carolina.

    Like Alaska, the media will not call it for Trump to promote the illusion of a Biden victory. North Carolina would bring Trump’s vote to 232.

    The vote count in Arizona shows Trump’s deficit shrinking from 30,000 on Friday to 18,500 on Saturday with about 100K left to count.

    After Arizona (11 votes). is fully counted, it will go through a recount subject to the pro-Trump bias identified in point 2. Were he to win Arizona, he would have 243 votes.

    In Georgia (16 votes), Biden leads by only 8400 votes, a margin that has been dropping.

    Like Arizona, Trump may still win the count and, if not, would have a very good chance of prevailing in the recount. With Georgia, Trump would have 259 votes.

    Wisconsin (10 votes) is tallied as having been won by Biden by 21,000 votes but a recanvass is in the offing. Given the facts enumerated earlier, there is a very good chance Trump will carry Wisconsin. The recount process in Wisconsin is uniquely fair and transparent — a model for the nation — so Trump may well flip the state.

    If he does, he will have 269 votes — one shy of victory.

    Then, it comes down Pennsylvania and its 20 votes. The Supreme Court provisionally allowed ballots to be counted if they arrived before Friday, Nov. 6 and were postmarked before election day, Nov. 3, and ordered late votes to be segregated. When Justice Alito was informed that the state had not segregated the late votes, as required in the Court’s decision, Alito reaffirmed the necessity of enforcing the court order.

    Joe Biden currently leads by 37,000 votes in Pennsylvania. The number of late arriving ballots likely far exceeds this total (the state has not published this information).

    Justice Alioto and a Court majority may throw out the late ballots, likely delivering the state to Trump.

    Additionally, for the reasons stated above, a recanvass is likely to give Trump a decisive advantage. If he wins Pennsylvania, he would have 289 votes and a victory.

    Will there be a recount in Pennsylvania? The current law requires one if the margin is under 0;.5% and in Pennsylvania it likely will be slightly greater.

    There are two ways to trigger a recount:

    —First, the U.S. Supreme Court could order one after the vote counters so flagrantly violated Alito’s order to segregate the votes that he had to re-issue it. And remember, four Justices wanted to reconsider whether to allow late ballots entirely but the high court deadlocked 4-4. Now with Justice Barrett in the mix it may take a different view, particularly if the presidency hangs in the balance.

    —Second, Article II Section 1 of the US Constitution reads:

    "Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress."

    The Pennsylvania State Legislature, solidly in Republican hands (both houses) may choose to demand a recount before appointing electors. To build the case for doing so, it may hold hearings into the allegations of fraud so as to help the voters of the state understand how flagrantly their votes were mishandled.

    Already, the leader of the State Senate in Pennsylvania and the Speaker of the State Assembly have held a press conference announcing their intention to "audit" the vote counting process.

    So, as the great Yogi Berra said, "It ain't over 'til the fat lady sings."

    She hasn’t.

    Dick Morris is former presidential advisor and political strategist. He is a regular contributor to Newsmax TV. Read Dick Morris's Reports
  8. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Nancy Pelosi claimed election was stolen.

    https://twitter.com/SpeakerPelosi/status/864522009048494080?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E864522009048494080%7Ctwgr%5E
  9. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    §m£ÂgØL already suicided.
  10. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny ok, close your eyes and spread your legs.

    Does your mother kiss you with that mouth?
  11. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Goodbye.
  12. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by frala Trump Drops Legal Challenge in Arizona

    https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/latest-updates-biden-trump-election-2020/card/jU8pMZdnj6SyRqNBnYgl

    The scope of that particular lawsuit was very narrow. It doesn't preclude other lawsuits currently under litigation.
  13. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    In the old days, one king would send his messenger to the other king to request surrender, and the other king (a Democrat, no doubt), would execute the messenger. It got to the point nobody wanted to be a king's messenger, so they had to raise the danger pay significantly.
  14. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by mmQ You wait for solstice to come back and agree on the terms of your wager for all of us to see.

    I await the winter solstice.
  15. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by mmQ Except you wouldnt be taking anything. It would amount to you demonstrating your assuredness and absolute confidence beyond merely saying so on the internet. Absolutely nothing to lose by doing so. You are either 100% confident in your claim and accept my proposal which allows you to ethically demonstrate that confidence, or you continue to circumvent it, admitting you're not as confident in your claim as you appear to be. There's no two ways about it. Sorry Jack. Refusing the bet is an admittance of weakness.

    Alright. Where do I go from here? Guide me.
  16. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    cerealpenis.gif
  17. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Yes. Yes, he does.
  18. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    "Therefore they will be like the morning mist, and like the dew that passes away early, like the chaff that is driven with the whirlwind out of the threshing floor, and like the smoke out of the chimney." ~ Hosea
  19. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by mmQ Solution: if he wins the bet, you simply dont take his money, having proven your point and also shown yourself to be correct

    If you lose, you pay out because that's how bets work. Solstice may himself also choose not to take your money, having demonstrated that he was correct.

    If you have 100% confidence in certainty in your belief, this is a win-win for all, as you prove your point, backed up with a demonstratable wager of confidence that supercedes a mere typed out declaration of "I know I'm right," and avoids your ethical issue of robbing someone of their money.

    It would still reek of taking candy from a baby.
  20. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 99
  6. 100
  7. 101
  8. 102
  9. 103
  10. 104
  11. ...
  12. 1897
  13. 1898
  14. 1899
  15. 1900
Jump to Top