gadzooks
Dark Matter
[keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
Originally posted by Wariat
Youre talking about hypocrytes though. Why would I not be pricks to them or call them out when they make thread after thread about me and never look at themselves or their own behaviors like star treks sexual deviancy with trannies? That cant be healthy for his family or people around him to be associated with can it? The debauchery prostitution etc. what does his fmaily or coworkers think?
And then you go and hate on Star Trek.
He's kinda one of the realist people on here.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
The US Supreme Court on Monday ruled that Sudan must pay hundreds of millions of dollars in punitive damages to some victims of the 1998 attacks on US embassies in Nairobi, Kenya and Dar es Salaam in Tanzania.
The court's unanimous decision applies only to claims brought by US nationals, members of the US military, and employees of the US government or embassy contractors.
Kenyan relatives of embassy workers or private contractors killed or injured in the bombing are not covered by Monday's ruling.
APPEALS COURT
The court stated that a US appeals court must now address the question of whether those Kenyan nationals are entitled to a share of the full $4.3 billion in punitive damages awarded by a US judge in 2011.
A Washington-based attorney representing the 567 plaintiffs, including Kenyans who brought the case, interpreted Monday's limited ruling as a victory.
DEEPLY GRATIFIED
“We are deeply gratified that the Supreme Court has validated the right of our clients to receive this measure of compensation,” said attorney Matthew McGill.
“We are hopeful that this soon will lead Sudan to reach a just and equitable resolution with its victims.”
A US attorney representing Sudan estimated that the Supreme Court decision applies to only about 20 per cent of the full $4.3 billion in punitive damages.
“Sudan looks forward to further proceedings in this continuing litigation while it remains engaged with the United States in negotiations to normalise the bilateral relationship,” said attorney Christopher Curran.
It has previously been decided in the US judicial system that Kenyan family members are entitled to some of an additional $6 billion in compensatory damages to be paid by Sudan.
But it is unlikely that the Kenyan families will receive anything close to the full amount of claims for which US courts have already held Sudan liable or might do so in the future.
SOVEREIGN DEBT
Sudan's recently installed reformist government has maintained that the nation's enormous sovereign debt would prevent it from making good on any multi-billion-dollar settlement arising from the embassy bombings.
But at the same time, Sudan is eager to resolve legal disputes in the US related to the 1998 attack that killed 212 Kenyan nationals and 12 US citizens.
Ten Tanzanians died in the nearly simultaneous bombing of the US embassy in Dar es Salaam.
Outstanding claims against Sudan are among the factors that the US has cited in declining to remove Sudan from a terrorism blacklist.
Yes. Same in USA. If you were allowed to own arms for your protection from government, they'd allow you to own fully automatic arms. How else would you defend against government agents armed with fully automatic arms? All they let you do is defend yourself from niggers, crackheads, and to train for the day you get drafted. In Canada we don't have these problems to that extent, so they don't allow firearms for self defence.
But yes the right is more extensive in the USA. If you tell a cop in Canada that you own guns specifically for self defence, you risk having your license revoked. Only three legal reasons for owning in Canada. Collecting, sport shooting and hunting. With this ban, collecting and sports shooting just took big hits. Gun clubs are liable to close, many of them survived because it was the only legal place to shoot an AR15. Big hits are coming to conservation revenue as a result. Not to mention the Long Gun registry here failed miserably after wasting billions of dollar of tax payer money. That was only to register guns. Now try to get 200k+ guns handed in and destroyed. With a government that's already near bankruptcy due to covid. It ain't going to happen.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Sudo
yeah you probably should have, jesus if you're opening up a dope shop LOCATION LOCATION LOCOMOTION so I hope the door is still open as it would likely be valuable.
On the other hand thats a hand in the street you dont want at the back of your head, not to do with getting caught or repercussions, just something your OCD will fixate on and keep you from focusing on other things. Depends how much you value money or piece of mind more
CHOOOO CHOOOOOOOOOOO
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
This does nothing but affect law abiding shooters. What's more baffling is why they continued their strategy of banning guns based on looks. The SKS remains legal, while the AR15 got banned. The tavor remains legal, and the BAR rifles. All designed for military use. M1 Garand stays legal, M14 got banned, despite having near exact functionality.
The scary thing with gun grabbers are, it is the one right you have, that you can exercize to protect your other rights. Once the right to firearms ownership is gone, all your other rights are easily up for grabs.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Obbe
Alan What?
[annoy my right-angled speediness]
Originally posted by CASPER
Fine ill fuck his chin in missionary position with maple syrup and brown gravy and ill beat the virtues of christianity into a tiny brown child while i do so
Ah gonna give him the 'ol Saskatoon Totem Pole?
The Sticky Flapjack?
Maybe the Manitoba Milk Bag?
Two-Handed Zamboni?
The Reverse Rick Moranis?
The 'ol One-Tusked Walrus?
Oh, I know. The Full Mountie. Perfect.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Sudo
I want to be part of your friends and fam.
In a sexual sadistic torturous murderous way where I end up really really dead? or simply in a close knit prison style way where everything stays in and out of the family for better or worse?
I'm open to both. We could contractual come up with something in the middle but there would have to be STRICT GUIDELINES.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
i tend to just walk the earth like sam jackson in pulp fiction til some pot belly sexual preator pic trucker picks me up. we stop for food and fucking. i eventually get where i wanna be. usually drunk as well. then friends and fam i visit wanna run for the hills or kill me depending on whom it is to me
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
