Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country
The world requires a US President who commands respect.
Someone whose erudition and success is equaled only by their humility and noble obligation to help the less fortunate.
Your oompa loompa in chief doesn't fit the bill.
Fortunately for America our president is more concerned about what the US needs in a US president than what the rest of the world needs from a US president.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Kuntzschutz
Let these pussy faggots go up against the US military and see what happens. But you won't, because they know our military would actually be effective, unlike the trannies in the mexican military and government.
If you want to invade and conquer Mexico that could easily be done from a martial stand point by the US no argument. But nobody wants that on the left or the right in the first place. Secondly it would take decades of resources to occupy and pacify it once military conquest was achieved. The problem is Mexico has already undergone an insurgency from both within and outside of it's borders. The cartels and the culture of them have permeated the fabric of Mexican society. Meaning many civilians either sympathize with or outright assist the cartels and their endeavors.
This only makes an outright assault by US armed forces into Mexico more complex as it would require fighting both federal uniformed forces along with un-uniformed combatants in both occupied and contested areas during and after the conquest. These are the same dynamics we faced Vietnam and Afghanistan. The only way US forces can engage with long term military and political success is to engage in counter insurgency operations at the invitation of and in cooperation with the Mexican government. Of course that invitation will never be sent because the cartels own the Mexican federal government.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Greenspam
You're a fucking retard. Indigenous Natives of what is the Mexico and southern US states made maze (corn) tortilla "shells" over hot rocks (like a pan)
the Europeans (Spanish) introduced the Natives to Wheat flour (or rice, rye mix) to them during the off seasons when corn flour was scarce
Correct, dating back to 10,000 B.C.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country
Bill and Hilly did vital work that provided employment to millions. The Clintons are globalist sell out traitors, not patriot minded representative leaders like our current commander in chief.
FTFY
You owe me tree fiddy for proofreading, editing, and the education.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Big League jedi
Nobody needs a justification to do whatever they want. You are free to not address them by their preferred pronoun. It just makes you an asshole.
In your opinion
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Literally bullshit. Calling someone who uses violence to further a specific political goal a terrorist is correct. Calling someone who does so to further the domination goals of their religion a "insert religion here" terrorists is also correct. Calling someone a christian terrorist because they used violence to further a specific political agenda and happen to be christian is bullshit.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by RottenRobert
Folks you don't need to rely on polls alone just look at what is happening. Even his lawyer (Guliani) is in trouble. Trump has been torpedoed and is going down like the Titanic.
Except they have been telling you that every night for three years. Get it yet?
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by RottenRobert
A majority of Americans endorse House Democrats' decision to launch an impeachment inquiry into President Trump and his administration's dealings with Ukraine, according to a new survey from the Pew Research Center.
The survey, which was released on Thursday, found that 54 percent of Americans support the impeachment inquiry, while 44 percent oppose it. The figure represents a four-point increase in support from a similar survey in September.
How did all those surveys in 2015 - 2016 pan out for your side?
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
