User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. ...
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

Posts by Enema Bandit

  1. I misread it anyway :(

    Been up all day.
  2. haha
  3. The MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING mentality is cray. It's all about submission and guilt. No evolutionary advantage.
  4. Originally posted by NARCassist well there you go, you have it on good authority from jill the jedi that you can be white.



    .

    Damn. I could have sworn Anglo-Saxons were white.

    You learn something new every day.
  5. Originally posted by infinityshock thats why i say race is a fake jedi construct

    "White" is a race, but here you are saying azns can't be white even though many azns have the same skin colour as "white" people.

    Originally posted by infinityshock humanity is divided into at least four different species

    Do you know anything about biology? Different species can't interbreed and produce fertile offspring. There are not four different "species" of human.
  6. Good luck being a vegetarian when the shit hits the fan. "We can just eat plants tho." Yeah, of course. That's why there's always an outbreak of cannibalism during times of war and famine. The 20th century was especially bad for it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_incidents_of_cannibalism#20th_century

    Things can only get worse.
  7. This is a "white" man:

    In this case, the state of "whiteness" is conditional. He is white because he killed a black man. If he himself had been the victim of a typical white man of European descent - the Marxist definition of a white man - he would not have been considered white.

    Take a look at this picture:

    Is the girl in the photo "white" or azn? She's azn, of course, but you would never have known that had it not been for the eels.
  8. Originally posted by infinityshock better luck playing the genetic lottery next time.

    My eyes are fine. Can't say the same about yours.
  9. Originally posted by infinityshock adjust some sliders in photoshop and either one can be a nigger

    Maybe that's why everyone thinks azns aren't white.
  10. Originally posted by Zanick When racists didn't want black kids in their children's classrooms, it was seen as wrong to make their schools the center of a social experiment. Moral reform only happens when the righteous margins convince the skeptical centrists of their view. The 'normal' people are now seen as stubborn, enforcing the lines of segregation we now detest. Some of those 'normal' people can be seen in the background of protest coverage, screaming "nigger" at first-graders. So whether you see yourself as normal or extreme, your actions are colored with moral conviction. If you're convinced that the prevailing strain of morality in society should be beyond question, you're part of a problem so big you can't see it.

    Are you comparing a social norm to a dietary norm? This an SJW leap of faith?

    Choosing not to eat meat for "moral" reasons goes against our nature. It's only 5000 years since the stone age ended. That's not a long time in evolutionary terms. Isn't it strange that the animals which evolved to be omnivorous - humans, rats, seagulls, raccoons, etc. - also happened to be the ones that survived and thrived?
  11. Originally posted by Zanick When you say that it's wrong to do something, you're making a moral claim - just like I am, except the morality you advocate by denying those on the margins is by default the prevailing morality.

    Being normal is not a moral choice. It is inherently amoral.

    However, it is wrong to impose your own half-baked, extremist morality on the rest of society. Communism is responsible for more than a hundred million unnatural deaths, not to mention the destruction of cultures, and Islam far more. It's important to deal with troublemakers before they have a chance to cause trouble.
  12. Originally posted by Zanick Yes it is, and the jury's still out. See Obbe's thread for more information on the latter.

    Yes what is? Is it wrong to eat meat, or is it wrong to eat plants? Why not both? Why not neither?

    For the sake of argument, I posit that it is immoral to eat plants. Plants may be incapable of independent movement and expressing themselves vocally, but they do not want to be eaten (fruits are of the plant; they are not the plant in itself). Many plants are poisonous, many are covered in barbs and thorns.

    When you eat plants (with the exception of fruits) you are going against the plant's wishes as a living being. Why should another living being give up its life to sustain yours?

    Originally posted by Zanick No, it's not, moral claims with a goal require people to assert them. You're advocating a specific morality just by suggesting otherwise.

    Which "specific morality" did I advocate when I made the following amoral statement?:
    It's not wrong to eat meat. It's not wrong to eat plants.
    I'm just not seeing it. Perhaps you could specifically point it out.
  13. It's not wrong to eat meat. It's not wrong to eat plants.

    It's wrong to impose a morality fad on others, though. When the shit hits the fan, these decadent attitudes will go down the sink.
  14. I like that.
  15. bundy
  16. Humans suck.

    If the apocalypse ever happens, me and my cats are eating humans. Humans are an abundant food source, but as things stand there are complications. It's illegal to kill and eat humans.

    For the time being, me and my cats have to eat other animals.
  17. Look at this cheerful chap:



    He's whiter than the president of the United States.
  18. Originally posted by Daily I'm afraid you have special needs

    I'm afraid you need your eyes tested.
  19. Koreans, too.
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. ...
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
Jump to Top