Posts by Bradley

1. 2024-08-17 at 3:13 PM UTC in Kafka should shit up
   

   Bradley Florida Man
   This thread was written at the urging of a certain Donald Trump
2. 2024-08-17 at 1:22 PM UTC in you cannot beat a man and hold him down for long guys
   

   Bradley Florida Man
   hey i need your help do you have recommendations for emulator sites?
   
   I normally would use Vimm's Lair. My friend recommended Emuparadise, both are down.
3. 2024-08-17 at 1:21 PM UTC in 🍬🍬Candy~Land🍬🍬
   

   Bradley Florida Man

   Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
   CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
   CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
   Case No. 2:23-cv-02687-SVW-JC Date July 25, 2024
   Title That One Video Entertainment LLC v. Koil Content Creation PTY LTD., et al.
   Present: The Honorable Jacqueline Chooljian, United States Magistrate Judge
   Kerri Hays None None
   Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No.
   Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants:
   none none
   Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER SUBMITTING, VACATING HEARING ON,
   AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO
   COMPEL (DOCKET NOS. 40, 42, 43)
   I. SUMMARY
   Pending before the Court and set for a hearing on July 30, 2024 at 9:30 a.m. are the parties’
   Motions to Compel which have been presented to the Court in the form of a single Joint Stipulation
   Regarding Dispute Over Production of Document (“Joint Stipulation” or “JS”) without a notice of
   motion. (See Local Rule L.R. 37-2 (discovery joint stipulation must be filed and served with notice of
   motion)).1 Plaintiff seeks an order compelling Defendant Koil Content Creation Pty Ltd. (“Koil” or
   “Defendant”) to produce further documents responsive to Plaintiff’s Document Request No. 16 (“RFP
   No. 16”) which calls for Defendant to produce all documents evidencing all revenues generated and
   costs incurred from Defendant’s operation of the NoPixel Server (“Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel”).
   Defendant seeks an order compelling Plaintiff to produce further documents responsive to Defendant’s
   Document Request No. 2 (“RFP No. 2”) which calls for Plaintiff to produce all communications
   between Plaintiff and Daniel Tracy that refer or reflect eleven specified subjects (“Defendant’s Motion
   to Compel”).
   Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, the
   Court finds the Motions to Compel appropriate for decision without oral argument. The hearing
   calendared for July 30, 2024 is hereby vacated and the Motions to Compel are taken off calendar and are
   submitted for decision.
   1In connection with the Motions to Compel, the parties have submitted the Joint Stipulation,
   Plaintiff’s Supplemental Memorandum, Defendant’s Supplemental Memorandum, a Declaration of
   Mitchell Clout (“Clout Decl.”) with an exhibit (“Clout Ex. 1”), a Declaration of Larry Zerner (“Zerner
   Decl.”) with exhibits (“Zerner Ex.”), and a Declaration of John M. Begakis (“Begakis Decl.”) with an
   exhibit (“Begakis Ex. A”). (Docket Nos. 40, 42, 43, 47).
   CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 9
   Case 2:23-cv-02687-SVW-JC Document 48 Filed 07/25/24 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:267
   UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
   CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
   CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
   Case No. 2:23-cv-02687-SVW-JC Date July 25, 2024
   Title That One Video Entertainment LLC v. Koil Content Creation PTY LTD., et al.
   Based on the parties’ submissions, the record and the pertinent facts and law, the Court grants in
   part and denies in part Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel and Defendant’s Motion to Compel as set forth
   below. The parties are ordered to provide the items called for by this Order within fourteen (14) days
   absent further order of the Court or written agreement of the parties.
   II. BACKGROUND
   On July 7, 2023, Plaintiff That One Video Entertainment (“Plaintiff” or “TOVE”) filed the
   operative First Amended Complaint (alternatively, “FAC”) against Defendant Koil and its founder/
   owner Mitchell Clout (“Clout”) (collectively “Defendants”), asserting claims for declaratory relief,
   breach of contract and an accounting. (Docket No. 18; Begakis Decl. ¶ 2). The First Amended
   Complaint alleges the following:
   Plaintiff is a content creation/business management company that employs various individuals in
   the videogame industry. (FAC ¶ 9). It employed a software developer named Daniel Tracey (“Tracey”).
   (FAC ¶ 9). As part of Tracey’s employment agreement, TOVE was permitted to contract with third
   parties to sell Tracey’s services and receive all compensation paid for the same. (FAC ¶ 10).
   Defendants operate a videogame server (the “NoPixel Server”), where individuals who play the
   “open world” video game Grand Theft Auto V (the “Game”), can role-play with other individuals in a
   closed game environment on the NoPixel Server. (FAC ¶ 11).
   Around early 2020, Defendants desired to engage Tracey in his role as a software developer to
   make significant updates to the NoPixel Server (the “Services”). (FAC ¶ 12). Defendants contracted
   with TOVE to obtain Tracey’s Services as an independent contractor in exchange for Defendants’
   agreement “to pay 50% of Game revenue to TOVE by way of [] Tracey (the ‘Agreement’).” (FAC
   ¶ 12).2
   2Defendants deny this allegation (Answer ¶ 12; see also JS at 4-5) and Defendant Clout attests:
   In May 2021, Defendant Koil entered into a contract with Tracey (not TOVE) for Tracey to work as a
   developer. (Clout Decl. ¶ 6). Koil paid Tracey a base salary of $10,000 per month. (Clout Decl. ¶ 6).
   In March 2022, Tracey proposed during extra services in exchange for addiitonal money from Koil.
   (Clout Decl. ¶ 7). One of the things that Koil asked Tracey to do was to set up additional international
   servers because at the time, the only international server was in India. (Clout Decl. ¶ 7). On March 22,
   2022, Tracey sent the terms of this employment proposal to Koil via the Discord messaging app. (Clout
   Decl. ¶ 7). Such message essentially reflects that Tracey would accept $10,000 per month as his base
   pay, plus 50% of the revenue from the existing India server, 50% from the Koil Whitelist Priority server,
   and 50% from the international servers he would help get online, and that the contract would be
   renegotiated every six months. (Clout Decl. ¶¶ 7-9; Clout Ex. 1). Tracey eventually helped get two
   additional international servers online (besides India), running Koil’s code – one for Spain and one that
   covered South America. (Clout Decl. ¶ 11). Until Tracey was terminated in December 2022, Koil paid
   CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 2 of 9
   Case 2:23-cv-02687-SVW-JC Document 48 Filed 07/25/24 Page 2 of 9 Page ID #:268
   UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
   CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
   CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
   Case No. 2:23-cv-02687-SVW-JC Date July 25, 2024
   Title That One Video Entertainment LLC v. Koil Content Creation PTY LTD., et al.
   During the aforementioned arrangement, TOVE did not execute an agreement stating that
   Tracey’s contributions were “works-made-for-hire” or were otherwise owned by Defendants. (FAC
   ¶ 12).
   From in or about early 2020 to in our about December 2022, Tracey rendered Services to
   Defendants. (FAC ¶ 13). In the process of rendering such Services, Tracey contributed significant
   creative contributions to both the “front end” visual aesthetics of the Game and the “back end”
   information management systems that allow the NoPixel Server to function. (FAC ¶ 13). Specifically,
   Tracey designed and created the entire payment processing system utilized by the NoPixel Server which
   has facilitated the processing of millions of dollars in payments to Defendants. (FAC ¶ 13).
   In late 2022, a personal dispute arose between Tracey and Defendant Clout, resulting in Clout
   terminating Tracey’s role with Defendant Koil and removing Tracey’s authority to access the Server.
   (FAC ¶ 15).
   On January 9, 2023, Plaintiff, through counsel, thereafter advised Defendants that all of Tracey’s
   contributions to the development of the NoPixel Server were exclusively owned by TOVE. (FAC ¶ 20).3
   On or about January 23, 2023, Defendants, through counsel, responded, claiming that Tracey had
   contributed nothing copyrightable to the NoPixel Server and that anything Tracey had contributed was
   permanently and irrevocably licensed to Defendants. (FAC ¶ 21). On or about February 6, 2024,
   Plaintiff, through counsel, disputed Defendants’ claims of lack of ownership and the existence of a
   license. (FAC ¶ 21).4 On February 10, 2024, Defendants, through counsel, again claimed that they had a
   perpetual, irrevocable license in and to Tracey’s contributions to the NoPixel Server. (FAC ¶ 23).
   As noted above, Plaintiff asserts claims for declaratory relief, breach of contract and an
   accounting. (Docket No. 18). As subsequently construed by the District Judge, Plaintiff’s first claim for
   declaratory relief essentially seeks a declaration that Plaintiff is a joint owner of the NoPixel Server and
   Tracey 50% of the revenue from the aforementioned four servers (Whitelist Priority, India, Spain and
   South America), which typically averaged between $40,000 to $50,000 per month. (Clout Decl. ¶ 12).
   At no point did Tracey ever ask for or receive any money from any server, other than the aforementioned
   four servers. (Clout Decl. ¶ 13). At no point did Clout ever speak to anyone at TOVE or agree to pay
   TOVE or Tracey money from any other server. (Clout Decl. ¶ 14).
   3It is not clear if this letter is the same or distinct from the January 9, 2024 letter sent to
   Defendant Clout on behalf of Tracey (not TOVE) by Attorney John M. Begakis, who now also
   represents Plaintiff in this action. (See Zerner Decl. ¶ 2; Zerner Ex. 2).
   4A copy of this letter, in which Attorney Begakis advises Defendants’ counsel that he now
   represented both Tracy and TOVE appears to be attached to the Zerner Declaration as Exhibit 3. (See
   Zerner Decl. ¶ 3; Zerner Ex. 3).
   CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 3 of 9
   Case 2:23-cv-02687-SVW-JC Document 48 Filed 07/25/24 Page 3 of 9 Page ID #:269
   UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
   CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
   CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
   Case No. 2:23-cv-02687-SVW-JC Date July 25, 2024
   Title That One Video Entertainment LLC v. Koil Content Creation PTY LTD., et al.
   that Defendants did not have a “license” to operate the NoPixel Server without accounting for profits to
   TOVE and could not operate the NoPixel Server under the guise of a license that allows it to keep all
   profits. (See Docket No. 26). Plaintiff’s second claim for breach of contract alleges that Defendants
   have breached the Agreement in that they have failed and refused, and continue to fail and refuse, “to
   pay TOVE 50% of the revenue generated from the NoPixel Server.” (FAC ¶ 32).5 Plaintiff’s third claim
   for an accounting alleges that Defendants have received money from the exploitation of Tracey’s
   creative contributions to the NoPixel Server without a license, a portion of which is therefore due to
   TOVE, and the amount of which cannot be ascertained without an order requiring Defendants to account
   to TOVE with respect to all transactions relating to Defendants’ exploitation of Tracey’s creative
   contributions to the NoPixel Server without a license. (FAC ¶¶ 35-37).
   On February 14, 2024, the District Judge denied Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the declaratory
   relief claim. (Docket No. 26).
   On or about April 8, 2024, Plaintiff served on Defendant Koil, Plaintiff’s First Set of Requests
   for the Production of Documents (“Plaintiff’s Document Requests”) containing RFP No. 16, which is in
   issue. (Begakis Decl. ¶ 3). Defendant served its initial responses to the Document Requests on May 8,
   2024. (Begakis Decl. ¶ 4). On May 9, 2024, Plaintiff’s counsel emailed Defendant’s counsel regarding
   asserted deficiencies in Defendant’s responses to the Document Requests. (Begakis Decl. ¶ 5; Begakis
   Ex. A). On May 22, 2024, counsel met and conferred regarding Defendant’s responses to Plaintiff’s
   Document Requests. (Begakis Decl. ¶ 6). On June 5, 2024, Defendant served supplemental responses
   to Plaintiff’s Document Requests but continued to refuse to provide any financial documents responsive
   to RFP No. 16, asserting that such documents were “unrelated to this litigation.” (Begakis Decl. ¶ 7).
   On June 12, 2024, the parties exchanged further communications but were unable to resolve their
   differences regarding RFP No. 16. (Begakis Decl. ¶ 8).
   On an unspecified date, Defendant Koil served Plaintiff with Defendant Koil’s First Set of
   Requests for the Production of Documents (“Defendant’s Document Requests”) containing RFP No. 2,
   which is in issue. (JS at 1, 5, 8-9). On an unspecified date, Plaintiff responded to Defendant’s
   Document Requests. (JS at 1, 5, 8-9). The parties apparently thereafter conferred regarding Plaintiff’s
   assertedly deficient production relative to RFP No. 2 – i.e., its asserted failure to produce documents
   post-dating 2022 – but were unable to resolve their differences. (JS at 1, 8-11).
   ///
   ///
   5In its recitation of “Facts Common to All Causes of Action,” Plaintiff alleges that Defendants
   agreed to pay Plaintiff “fifty percent (50%) of Game revenue,” but in the breach of contract claim,
   Plaintiff instead alleges that Defendants agreed to pay Plaintiff “50% of revenue generated from the
   NoPixel Server.” (Compare FAC 12 with FAC 31). It thus appears that Plaintiff equates revenue from
   the NoPixel Server with revenue from the Game.
   CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 4 of 9
   Case 2:23-cv-02687-SVW-JC Document 48 Filed 07/25/24 Page 4 of 9 Page ID #:270
   UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
   CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
   CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
   Case No. 2:23-cv-02687-SVW-JC Date July 25, 2024
   Title That One Video Entertainment LLC v. Koil Content Creation PTY LTD., et al.
   III. DISCUSSION AND RULINGS
   A. Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel – RFP No. 16
   Plaintiff’s RFP No. 16 calls for Defendant to produce: “All DOCUMENTS evidencing all
   revenues generated, and costs incurred, from YOUR operation of the NOPIXEL SERVER.” (JS at 6).6
   Defendant initially interposed multiple objections to RFP No. 16 – asserting that it is
   burdensome, oppressive, overbroad, compound, vague, ambiguous and unintelligible – but, without
   waiving such objections, and after assertedly conducting a diligent search and making reasonable
   inquiry, responded: “Based on the ambiguous and unclear definition provided for the NOPIXEL
   SERVER, Responding Party is unable to provide a response.” (JS at 6).7
   Defendant thereafter provided a supplemental response which reasserted the same objections, but
   notwithstanding and without waiving such objections, responded: “The subject documents are already
   in the possession, custody, and control of the Propounding Party insofar as the requested documents
   were produced to the Propounding Party on or about May 8, 2024. The responsive documents are
   contained within Bates #MC0068 to Bates #MC0072 produced [t]herewith, which reflect the 50% net
   participation agreement between TRACEY and NoPixel via Discord on March 14, 2022. Propounding
   Party’s definition of “NOPIXEL SERVER” is otherwise overbroad as it: (a) encompasses over 172
   servers, (b) would require production of financial documents unrelated to this litigation, © [is] wholly
   unrelated to any work performed by TRACEY, and (d) is therefore, not calculated to lead to the
   discovery of admissible evidence.” (JS at 6-7).8
   6Plaintiff has not supplied the Court with the actual Document Requests which presumably
   define the capitalized terms. As to the term “NOPIXEL SERVER,” the Court proceeds on the
   assumption that it has been defined in a manner consistent with the definition thereof in the First
   Amended Complaint, i.e., that it refers to “a videogame server, wherein individuals who play the ‘open
   world’ videogame entitled ‘Grand Theft Auto V’ . . . can ‘role-play’ with other individuals in a closed
   Game environment on such server” (FAC ¶ 11),” but, given the information supplied by Defendants
   regarding multiple servers, further presumes that even though the term is singular, the “NOPIXEL
   SERVER” is actually comprised of 172 servers, including the four specific servers identified by
   Defendants. (See supra note 2; JS at 6-7).
   7Defendant also incorporated its “Preliminary Statement” as though fully set forth in such
   response but Defendant has not supplied the Court with such statement or its actual responses to
   Plaintiff’s Document Requests which presumably contain such statement.
   8Defendant again incorporated its “Preliminary Statement” as though fully set forth in such
   supplemental response but has not supplied the Court with such statement or its actual responses to
   Plaintiff’s Document Requests which presumably contain such statement.
   CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 5 of 9
   Case 2:23-cv-02687-SVW-JC Document 48 Filed 07/25/24 Page 5 of 9 Page ID #:271
   UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
   CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
   CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
   Case No. 2:23-cv-02687-SVW-JC Date July 25, 2024
   Title That One Video Entertainment LLC v. Koil Content Creation PTY LTD., et al.
   As noted above (see supra note 2), Defendant takes the position that its only agreement was with
   Tracey (not TOVE), that such agreement only required Defendant to pay and Defendant did pay Tracey –
   until Tracey’s termination in December 2022 – $10,000 per month base pay and 50% of the revenue
   from Defendant’s India, Koil Whitelist Priority, Spain and South America servers, and that at no point
   did Defendant’s owner/founder Clout ever speak to anyone at TOVE or agree to pay TOVE or Tracey
   money from any other server. (JS at 8; Clout Decl. ¶¶ 7-9, 11-14; Clout Ex. 1). Defendant Clout
   represents that he has agreed to give Plaintiff revenue statements from the four aforementioned servers
   (presumably Bates #MC0068 to Bates #MC0072 referenced in Defendant Koil’s supplemental response
   to RFP No. 16), but Defendant declines to agree to produce revenue from any other servers as they are
   assertedly completely outside the scope of the agreement in issue. (JS at 8; Clout Decl. ¶ 15).
   Plaintiff essentially argues that Defendant’s response is insufficient because Defendant’s
   production does not include documents evidencing all revenues generated, and costs incurred, from
   Defendant’s operation of all servers that assertedly constitute “the NOPIXEL SERVER” and instead is
   limited to documents evidencing revenues generated/costs incurred from only those servers that
   Defendant contends are relevant to the action under Defendant’s theory of the case. (JS at 7). Plaintiff
   contends that the requested discovery is relevant and proportional to the needs of the case because the
   First Amended Complaint alleges that Plaintiff “is a co-owner in the copyright of the code comprising
   the NoPixel Server and is entitled to fifty percent (50%) of the revenues generated therefrom pursuant to
   the parties’ agreement . . . and because the scope of Plaintiff’s potential ownership and right to profits is
   broad enough to entitle Plaintiff to half of all monies reflected in such requested documents.” (JS at 7-
   8).
   The Court is not unsympathetic to Defendant’s position – particularly given the evidence it has
   submitted regarding a relatively narrow agreement with Tracey versus the absence of any evidence
   submitted by Plaintiff to support its different/broader allegations regarding the parties to and terms of the
   agreement in issue. However, as relevance is determined by reference to the pleadings9 – here, the
   operative First Amended Complaint – the Court is compelled to conclude that documents evidencing
   revenues generated and costs incurred from Defendant’s operation of all of the servers that comprise the
   “NOPIXEL SERVER” is relevant to at least the damages assessment for the breach of contract claim

4. 2024-08-17 at 1:03 PM UTC in How do they get them to do this? Bradley ur thoughts?
   

   Bradley Florida Man
   They just find young teens who are eager to please older men. These are very common in countries liek Czech Republic, Hungary, Columbia, even the USA, most of Africa, Russia, Latvia, many western nations and all middle eastern/muslim countries.
   
   Most of these countries are just filled with young people who like a guy who is older, mature, not trashy and young and they want to be with him especially if he's an artist and still likes to play video games and watch TV and go out.
   
   It is only in Poland, I feel like, where young women aren't interested in older guys even if they have their own place
   
   I also heard in Columbia many women find it attractive if a guy is into dog porn,
5. 2024-08-17 at 2:56 AM UTC in When i attempt to befriend people they usually pull away from me...
   

   Bradley Florida Man

   Originally posted by WellHung Please set me up with an account. I'm in. 👍

   
   u gotta use ur telephone number, i've tried making multiple accounts. it doesn't work
6. 2024-08-17 at 2:53 AM UTC in My face is swollen, I have a severe tooth infection
   

   Bradley Florida Man
   OP Have you tried jacking off on cam?
7. 2024-08-17 at 2:47 AM UTC in I wrote a poem for Wariat or Warcry
   

   Bradley Florida Man
   In a world full of hatred and scorn
   There lies a man named Wariat, forlorn
   He cannot fathom why he is despised
   Unloved, unwanted, always criticized
   
   Wariat wanders through life all alone
   No friends to call his very own
   Young women shudder at his approach
   For they know he is nothing but a roach
   
   BradleyB, a shining beacon of light
   Always right, never in a fight
   The best friend that Wariat ever had
   Yet he pushes him away, it's just so sad
   
   No one likes Wariat, online or in person
   His mere presence is deemed a curse on
   He longs for love, for someone to care
   But he's met with cold, indifferent stares
   
   Pedophiles, a topic of disgust
   Yet Wariat wonders why they must
   Receive such hate, such disdain
   He longs for acceptance, but in vain
   
   Young women will never sleep with him
   His heart aches, his chances slim
   He dreams of love, of a tender touch
   But it seems his fate is sealed as such
   
   BradleyB, always right, always true
   Yet Wariat pushes him away, what can he do?
   He wants nothing to do with his friend
   Leaving Wariat alone, his heart to mend
   
   In his darkest hours, Wariat thinks
   Perhaps it's time for him to sink
   Into the depths of despair and sorrow
   To end it all, no more tomorrow
   
   But deep down, a flicker of hope
   A tiny voice telling him to cope
   To reach out, to try again
   To mend the bonds, to break the chain
   
   For love is not always easy to find
   But it's worth the struggle, worth the grind
   Wariat, don't give up just yet
   There's still a chance, don't you forget
   
   BradleyB, the friend you push away
   He's there for you, come what may
   Reach out to him, mend the rift
   For true friendship is a precious gift
   
   And as for love, it will come in time
   Don't worry much you'll be just fine.
   Ass eating, dog fucking it's on your mind
   Porno Dan you're true love, you find.
8. 2024-08-17 at 2:39 AM UTC in Does Greenland even exist anymore?
   

   Bradley Florida Man
   Yes. It's just sparsely populated and minds its own business.
9. 2024-08-17 at 2:36 AM UTC in Just curious
   

   Bradley Florida Man
   I'm not petty and neither are my coats.
10. 2024-08-17 at 2:35 AM UTC in How many of tou
    

    Bradley Florida Man
    I like sex
11. 2024-08-17 at 2:35 AM UTC in Imagine being this child for a second.
    

    Bradley Florida Man
    great thread, I whole heartedly agree with the destruction of children's faces to be awful and an evil action.
12. 2024-08-16 at 7:26 PM UTC in Hey Bradley
    

    Bradley Florida Man

    Originally posted by Warcry Why wont you just play Diablo 1 in your browser its like one of the ebst games you can play to experience true pc gaming:
    https://www.gamesradar.com/games/action-rpg/the-original-1996-diablo-is-now-fully-playable-inside-your-browser-and-its-still-a-vibe-unmatched-by-the-best-action-rpgs-ever/

    
    I played dialbo 3 extensively on my ps4 for awhile
13. 2024-08-16 at 7 PM UTC in Being afraid of commitement
    

    Bradley Florida Man

    Originally posted by Warcry I believe bradley is in the same boat hence why he went all gay all of a sudden and not bo he knows his life situation doesn’t let him or really isn’t easy for him to have room in his life for a true life partner.

    
    what
14. 2024-08-16 at 6:59 PM UTC in Being afraid of commitement
    

    Bradley Florida Man

    Originally posted by Warcry I believe guys that me and Kafka are the only posters on here who are afraid of commitment or of someone of the opposite gender getting close and making us feel vulnerable. The redhead was the closest anyone got to me as of the last few years and look how she hurt me guys. I mean that’s why I think besides being into the taboo and porn factor of age play I get turned on by way older women who still look good and the youngins I just don’t want a serious traditional relationship.

    
    good news bro, no ones gonna want you to commit to them lol
15. 2024-08-16 at 6:58 PM UTC in My teeth hurt
    

    Bradley Florida Man
    Have fun nigga, I got an extremely high pain tolerance that comes with a chronic ailment and when I had my shit infected due to my tooth i forgot what they call it
    
    The bottom of the tooth that touched the root was hollow and it was causing infections so they were gonna doa root canal but my alcoholic ass waited too long to get it treated so they ended up popping that bitch out with this dental crowbar thing.
    
    Fucking worse pain ever when I had that shit. I started with anti biotics, oral gel numbing liquid, ibuprophen, and a swishing mouth wash for pain.
    
    Bor I would use the mouthwash, and just let hte mouthwash sit in my mouth for ten minutes, then I would put the oragel on and it would feel 2-3/10 on the bad scale and withina half hour it was 7/8 throbbing with breakthrough pain of 10-11 that left me biting a rag and rocking back and forth wishing I could just move past the feeling in my body and exist somewhere without the pain
    
    Then they crowbared that shit out and I couldn't be happier.
    
    
16. 2024-08-16 at 6:53 PM UTC in The longest thread on the internet! Free custom LOLcats inside! Ask within!
    

    Bradley Florida Man
    If this thread was my dick's twin it couldn't be any longer.
    
    Also RIP PlzDontBan
    
    Forever in ur boyfriend Poast's heart and butt.
17. 2024-08-16 at 4:04 PM UTC in Pros and Cons of mobile phones
    

    Bradley Florida Man
    Do you think that's what gave you such strong brain damage?
18. 2024-08-16 at 4:03 PM UTC in Why do so many men lie to other men or themselves
    

    Bradley Florida Man
    U kiss buffalo? I didn't even know Poland had buffalo
19. 2024-08-16 at 3:59 PM UTC in The best part about the news is discovering all the bad things that happen to people out there...
    

    Bradley Florida Man
    I like the happy stories they end with
20. 2024-08-16 at 3:47 PM UTC in The best part about the news is discovering all the bad things that happen to people out there...
    

    Bradley Florida Man
    I had tooth marks on my penis before, not from a shark though