U think this is a healthy culture where drugs are accepted but sex isn’t? Where selling drugs to teens even young ones is considered normal. Ur fucking a teen is bad? This is a healthy culture Łódź Poland to you?
On top of pierś looking like his walking like how claiming they ain’t no Tiffany Taylors or girls just u to older men etc.
Is this the female culture and cizilizarion you’d want to be around? Zero repercussions fuck toy to ur face for no reason just saying hi or walking by free digs free shit never putting out rudeness zero culture hate older men than even fucking dogs etc etc?
You would want to live in a country they’d rather fuck a dog than an older guy Michael Myers’s and talks hit on the street with zero repercussions or slaps or the New York punching game they’d get in other countries for saying fuck you?
Ou would rather be a sucker or so ply used for material possessions or only have to fuck females in ur exact age be a country like Australia Tiffany Taylor at 16 even has to put out to retirees for her drug money? And no suckers exist like lame pollackistan?
Why can’t there be a so tle Tiffany Taylor here for me or anywhere if everyone is different Michael Myers’s and only they. Exist in Australia or richer first world civilised nations?
I’d much rather live in a place they’re open to sex work and older men and not just suckers or frajera or expect free drugs and shit wouldn’t you? Meaning expect shit without putting out and be shotty as people and disrespectful to elders like the polish ones or is this what you’d want?
I’d much rather be around Hungarian or Chechen or be born and live in such a country than these rude princess self entitled tests bro plus why if everyone is diff it is so based on country not person why are they all tests and princesses here?
„ Historians have argued that increasing the age of consent also gave the law a more pronounced regulatory dimension. In practice, these laws were often used to control the behavior of the working-class girls. Yet reformers at the time saw no distinction between protection and regulation: in making it a crime for girls to decide to have sexual intercourse outside marriage, the law protected them from themselves and from the immature understanding that led them to behaviors reformers considered immoral.
In addition to class, the intersection of race and age also gave the law a regulatory character. In India, for example, the prevalence of the custom of child marriage among Hindus led the British colonial authorities to apply the age of consent to married as well as unmarried girls, thereby creating a crime of marital rape that did not exist in British law. The 1860 Indian Penal Code set the age at 10 years; in 1891 the age of consent but not the age of marriage was raised to 12 years. As a result, the age of consent regulated the consummation of marriage, ensuring that it was delayed until an age when Indian girls were considered likely to have begun menstruating.
A furious debate preceded the enactment of the 1891 law, focused in large part on whether the law violated the commitment the British government had made in 1857 not to interfere in native cultures. That Indian law set the age lower than British law reflected ideas that non-white races "matured earlier," in part because of the environments in which they originated. In the U.S., those who opposed resetting the age of consent to 16 made similar arguments about African-Americans, Mexicans, and Italian immigrants. Australian legislators even claimed that white girls living in sub-tropical climates "ripened" into women earlier than those in Europe.
The behavior of underage girls gave support to both proponents and opponents of the increased age of consent. Increasingly living in cities and working in factories, offices and stores, working-class girls with a new freedom from the supervision of family members and neighbors cultivated a flamboyant, sexually expressive style that extended to consensual sexual activity, usually with men only a few years their elders. Their new freedom brought girls danger as well as pleasure: subordination at work and dependence on men for access to leisure, limited their agency and ability to consent, and sometimes exposed them to sexual violence. Girls involved in age of consent prosecutions came in roughly equal numbers from each of those groups.
In the 1930s, support for setting the age of consent at 16 years or older began to weaken. Characterized by growing economic, social, and cultural independence, girls in their teens assumed a place in western societies quite distinct from that of younger children. New concepts of adolescence and specifically of girlhood normalized sexual activity during the teenage years, at least within peer groups, as "sex play" necessary to achieve adult heterosexuality. Emboldened and influenced by such ideas, girls more often talked of being "in love" with the men charged with having sex with them, and expressed sexual desire. Prosecutors and juries increasingly refused to treat such cases as rape.”
„ Near the end of the 18th century, other European nations began to enact age of consent laws. The broad context for that change was the emergence of an Enlightenment concept of childhood focused on development and growth. This notion cast children as more distinct in nature from adults than previously imagined, and as particularly vulnerable to harm in the years around puberty. The French Napoleonic code provided the legal context in 1791 when it established an age of consent of 11 years. The age of consent, which applied to boys as well as girls, was increased to 13 years in 1863.
Like France, many other countries, increased the age of consent to 13 in the 19th century. Nations, such as Portugal, Spain, Denmark and the Swiss cantons, that adopted or mirrored the Napoleonic code likewise initially set the age of consent at 10-12 years and then raised it to between 13 and 16 years in the second half of the 19th century. In 1875, England raised the age to 13 years; an act of sexual intercourse with a girl younger than 13 was a felony. In the U.S., each state determined its own criminal law and age of consent ranged from 10 to 12 years of age. U.S. laws did not change in the wake of England's shift. Nor did Anglo-American law apply to boys.
Behind the inconsistency of these different laws was the lack of an obvious age to incorporate into law. Although scientists and physicians had established that menstruation and puberty occurred on average around age 14 in Europe at this time, different individuals experienced it at different ages -- a fluid situation at odds with the arbitrary line drawn by whatever age was incorporated into law.”
I am a martial artist and a scholar and an artist as well.
Plus I’d have my army back then if loyal servants and a castle and shit.
Nobody would be able to get me or kill me during those times you moron and juries wouldn’t concoct me because I’m a bad ass I can handle a sword well you retard I’m ducking g g to the fucking max ya dig?
British society was on my side at the time nor yours queers
Ask Vinny jellyell you he knows the history as he studied it in late 19rh century and they had debates about making it 16 from 14 ir had to be done in stages where the original version didn’t I douse rjsoe form lower classes or some shit or any dude could just say she lied about her age at first.
In Poland they still equate homosexuality with pedophilia not teenage sexuality though.
Again if it’s so bad why would porno Dan only Rick teenagers and want to be rimmed by then so much? Why not like other pirno stars fuck 20 or 20 something yr olds once I. A while even bootleg mostly does?
