User Controls

Trannies are just sicko perverts and nothing more

  1. #61
    Originally posted by stl1 Proof?

    It could dress like that because it enjoys it.

    Wake up gramps that's my whole point...he doesn't know what it identifies as...he is assuming. My example was to point that out...holy shit the dumb dumb is strong on nis today.
  2. #62
    Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood You're fucking blind

    lolol no, you are imagining...It's wearing fucking clothes...if I put a can of peas in my shirt would you say I had 1 tit like technologist too?

    lolol.
  3. #63
    HURRR WHATS A PRONOUN DOC
  4. #64
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson lolol no, you are imagining…It's wearing fucking clothes…if I put a can of peas in my shirt would you say I had 1 tit like technologist too?

    lolol.

    No I would say you're a blind fucking retard that doesn't understand what a pronoun is and thinks doctor is a gender identity. I think it's time for your daily dose

  5. #65
    Grylls Cum Looking Faggot [abrade this vocal tread-softly]
    pls don’t fight guise
  6. #66
    Originally posted by Grylls pls don’t fight guise

    We are not fighting we are pronouning.
  7. #67
    stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson It's clearly dressing as a woman to try and dupe people like grylls into handing over the coin..that's a business decision not a statement of what it self identifies as…it's just a work uniform.
  8. #68
    IF I PUT A LAMP SHADE ON MY HEAD I DoN'T SUDDENLY TURN INTO A LAMP LOL WHAT NOW TRANNIES??? BTFO

  9. #69
    Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood No I would say you're a blind fucking retard that doesn't understand what a pronoun is

    Um what the fuck does that have to do with you making assumptions about people based only on their appearance...lololol.

    Again, It's it's work uniform, you have only seen a pic of it carrying out it's job function...your assumptions are just that, assumptions.
  10. #70
    stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson lolol no, you are imagining…It's wearing fucking clothes…if I put a can of peas in my shirt would you say I had 1 tit like technologist too?

    lolol.



    Put that can in your pant and your peanis might work better.
  11. #71
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Again, It's it's work uniform,

    Sounds like an assumption to me.
  12. #72
    Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood IF I PUT A LAMP SHADE ON MY HEAD I DoN'T SUDDENLY TURN INTO A LAMP LOL WHAT NOW TRANNIES??? BTFO


    Which again has nothing to do with the point, which was you making assumptions.

    According to your assumption that a dude in a dress automatically means he identifies as a woman..then a dude in a lampshade also automatically identifies as a lamp.

    You just destroyed your own argument.
  13. #73
    Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood Sounds like an assumption to me.

    now you are finally getting it...
  14. #74
    stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  15. #75
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Which again has nothing to do with the point, which was you making assumptions.

    According to your assumption that a dude in a dress automatically means he identifies as a woman..then a dude in a lampshade also automatically identifies as a lamp.

    You just destroyed your own argument.

    As soon as you see a dick you assume it's a 'costume' which is your own bias taking precedent over common sense. Asian cultures are more lax with the pronouns and use the term ladyboy but they use female pronouns, have feminine names and present as females.

    I don't know why this is so hard for you to understand.
  16. #76
    Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood As soon as you see a dick you assume it's a 'costume' which is your own bias taking precedent over common sense.

    Wrong, I didn't make any assumption...I created a counter argument to highlight your assumption. A basic level on intellect would have recognized that.

    When you don't know you shouldn't assume...as you did. the faggit might well identify as a woman...but it might also identify as a fucking goat for all you know!

    Durrr.
  17. #77
    Grylls Cum Looking Faggot [abrade this vocal tread-softly]
    Originally posted by stl1

    Okay I’d fuck a couple of them (no homo)
  18. #78
    stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Jiggle Booty would argue with a potato if it helped get him to 4 pm.
  19. #79
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson but it might also identify as a fucking goat for all you know!

    Oh wow you are so right how did I never consider that doc

    Originally posted by Grylls Okay I’d fuck a couple of them (no homo)

    they were mostly scuffed but some of them had nice tits
  20. #80
    tee hee hee Naturally Camouflaged [slangily complete this slumberer]
    Originally posted by Grylls Okay I’d fuck a couple of them (no homo)

    😮that adam's apple sure jumps out at u BIGTIME
Jump to Top